12 Points Totting Up Archives - Page 10 of 11 - Forrest Williams Archive - Forrest Williams - page 10 12 Points Totting Up Archives - Page 10 of 11 - Forrest Williams

Freephone: 0800 1933 999
Mobile Freephone: 01623 397 200

Chat Online

Motoring Advice Blog

Archive for the ‘12 Points Totting Up’ Category

Birmingham Magistrates Motoring Solicitor – 12 points, avoiding a ban

Motoring lawyers, like all solicitors are ultimately judged on results.

Anyone can say they are good in court but we back our claims up with hard facts.

We list the results we get so you can see just how effective we are for our clients.

The details may have changed so that the client can not be identified but the facts are accurate.

CHARGE – No Insurance

POINTS ON LICENCE CURRENTLY – 6

The minimum number of points the court can impose is 6 therefore the court will have to disqualify the client unless we can convince them that he will suffer exceptional hardship. Client is dependant upon his licence in order to do his job.

RESULT – 6 points, court accept that he will suffer exceptional hardship and allow him to keep his licence. Fined 1 weeks wages.

Exceptional Hardship – Tony Pulis Defence

Specialist Motoring Lawyer Steve Williams reviews the argument for Exceptional Hardship.

Tony Pulis kept his licence yesterday despite speeding at 96 in a 60 and already having 9 points on his licence. The court gave him 6 points for speeding which meant he had a total of 15 points. Once a driving has 12 points or more the court have to disqualify them for 6 months unless they can show exceptional hardship.

Exceptional hardship is more than just inconvenience or hardship, it has to be over and above what you would normally expect from being banned for 6 months and can relate to either the driver or anyone else.

Steve Williams specialises in exceptional hardship applications and is proud of the fact that he has rarely lost a case, this case would have been a challenge though.

“The problem here is that Tony Pulis is very well paid and although he has to do a lot of driving for his job he could not argue that he would lose his job if he was disqualified. The court would expect a football club who pay players £50,000 a week to be able to afford to pay a driver for their manager, or indeed Tony Pulis could have paid for a driver himself. The normal type of application in these circumstances is that someone would lose their job and then suffer exceptional financial hardship. This wasn’t going to work here.

The application was made on the basis that a lot of his work is very confidential and has to be kept secret and although he could afford a driver this would mean that he could not discuss confidential issues in front of the driver and therefore his ability to work would be severely curtailed to the detriment of the football club and this would have a knock on effect on the people of Stoke who benefit from their football club doing so well.

It’s an interesting argument that the town folk of Stoke would suffer if their team were unable to sign star names in secret. Presumably not an argument that the manager of Hereford Town could use given their precarious position at the bottom of the table they couldn’t suffer much more than they already are!”

 

 

Motoring Solicitor’s Diary – Nottingham Magistrates Court

Today was a pretty typical day for Steve Williams,  a Motoring Solicitor

I was in my local Court, Nottingham Magistrates Court. My client had been caught speeding, travelling at 37 in a 30mph limit. This would normally mean that she would be dealt with by way of a fixed penalty of 3 points and a £60 fine.

Unfortunately for my client she already had 9 points on her licence at the time of the offence which meant that she would have to be disqualified for 6 months by the court. This would have an awful effect on her and her family, she was the only wage earner and she could not do her job without her driving licence.

I had previously advised my client that I was confident that I would be able to convince the court to let her keep her licence as we would be able to argue that she would suffer exceptional hardship if she was banned.

The case at Nottingham Magistrates Court was listed along with many others, most of the defendants were facing simple speeding fines, where the speed was too high to be dealt with by way of a fixed penalty. Just before our case was called on a man in his 30’s appeared before the court to argue the same thing as us. He was a senior account manager for a large company and was well presented and articulate. He was not represented. He presented what was on the face of it a good case however it started to crumble as the Crown Prosecutor probed his case and cross examined him.

The upshot was that the court refused his application and banned him for 6 months. I felt sorry for him, he had a good case. With proper preparation and forewarning of the type of questions he would have been asked he would have kept his licence and job. I am confident I would have won that for him and for the cost of less than a weeks wages he would have kept his job.

My client had sat at the back of court and despite my reassurances that she would win her exceptional hardship application she looked terrified after seeing the mauling that the previous defendant had got. When her case was called on I went through her case asking her all of the questions I knew the prosecutor would ask. There were no questions from the prosecutor, no room for him to argue and the court allowed her to keep her licence.  She left court very relieved.

**Steve Williams is the Motoring Solicitor, these diaries are based on true case, details, including the court have been changed in order to protect the clients confidentiality. Not all of Steve Williams’ cases are reported in the diary.

If you would like advice from Steve Williams call 01623 397200

Forrest Williams TV