Tag Archive for "case studies" - Forrest Williams - page 16 case studies Archives - Page 16 of 17 - Forrest Williams

Freephone: 0800 1933 999
Mobile Freephone: 01623 397 200

Chat Online

Motoring Advice Blog

Posts Tagged ‘case studies’

Police Station Representation For Drink Driving Clients

We recently acted for a client charged with Drink Driving at Leicester Magistrates Court.  Throughout his conversations with us he maintained that he was not guilty of the offence, and that he only consumed alcohol after he had driven. In short his story to us was that he had purchased the alcohol, driven, parked up and then drank it. He had always intended to sleep where he was as had had a fight with his partner earlier so was going to stay away for a bit.

 

Post driving consumption is a defence to Drink Driving.

 

We therefore entered a Not Guilty plea and the matter was adjourned to trial.  As part of the case preparation we took a statement from the client, and we interrogated all the evidence against our client. Initially it seemed to be quite a strong case – the police even had the bottle the client said he had been drinking from and we had a statement from the Police Officer involved to confirm that they had confiscated the bottle.

 

Unfortunately the client was found Guilty of the offence, with the court highlighting that the most damaging evidence was that of his own words. When asked under interview, our client had twice denied drinking anything after driving.  Our client’s reason for this, to us, was that he was drunk and probably either misunderstood the question or didn’t want to make things worse for himself. He maintained his position that he only drank after parking up and that he had not intended to drive for several hours, not until he would have been legal to do so.

 

The warning when you are arrested does state that anything you say can be used in evidence in court and in this case it was and this was the evidence that the court focused on. Everyone, regardless of charge, is entitled to legal representation at the station if they are to be interviewed. We would always remind our clients to take advantage of this right, and to remember that if you have nothing to hide then be open and honest about this. Saying No Comment when you have a valid defence can be just as damaging as the courts will ask why you didn’t tell the police important facts at the time.

 

If you are arrested for an offence give our team a call on 01623 397200.  We can arrange for police station representation to guide you through the interview process and to try and ensure that nothing you say, or don’t say, can later be used against you to undermine your defence.

Punitive Magistrates Find Exceptional Hardship Unsuccessful

Legal Advisor Encourages Appeal Following Unsuccessful Exceptional Hardship Application

 

At her hearing today at Nottingham Magistrates’ Court, our client Kylie Bannister told her barrister that she was disappointed by the magistrates’ decision not to allow her application for Exceptional Hardship.

 

In a case which demonstrates that not every Forrest Williams client achieves a favourable outcome at the first hearing, it is fair to say that there was a genuine feeling that today’s ruling called into question exactly how decisions regarding Exceptional Hardship applications – ie whether they are successful or not – are made.

 

Kylie had worked very closely with her case handler over several months, gradually building the strongest possible application. It was an investment of time as well as money because, for Kylie, there was such a lot at stake. By the end of the process, the volume of paperwork ready to be considered by the court, in support of Kylie’s application, was impressive.

 

If Kylie’s application was unsuccessful, she knew from the beginning that this meant she would be disqualified from driving for a period of 6 months. (She knew she had the right of appeal, but this would obviously incur further costs.) For Kylie, a disqualification would be extremely difficult to bear as she is employed within the publishing industry, on a freelance contract, and has to travel across the whole of the country, at short notice, to meet with clients and industry executives.

 

In addition, Kylie told us that she is essentially the breadwinner for her household as her partner is in lower-paid, temporary employment. Therefore, if she were to be disqualified from driving for 6 months, exceptional hardship would be suffered by her family, which includes 3 young children.

 

After hearing full evidence, the magistrates retired for 10 minutes to consider their verdict. Once they returned, they informed Kylie and her barrister that they had not found the test for Exceptional Hardship had been met.

 

In an interesting twist, however, the Legal Advisor strongly advised Kylie’s barrister immediately after the hearing that they ought to consider an appeal and apply to have her disqualification lifted pending the appeal.

 

From speaking to court staff, it became clear that no favourable decisions had been made during the whole of the day and that the magistrates’ approach towards all defendants was punitive, to say the least.

 

Forrest Williams are now discussing a possible appeal with Kylie, in the hope that when this application is re-considered in the Crown Court it will be allowed – and Kylie enabled to continue driving.

 

This case goes to show that Exceptional Hardship applications are not easy, or straightforward. While we can never guarantee a successful outcome, Forrest Williams always endeavour to prepare as fully as possible, and this is reflected in our very high success rates of well over 90%.  In the rare event that an application is not successful, we ensure that our clients are advised honestly about their right of appeal, additional fees and chances of success at the Crown Court. 

 

If you would like to discuss an Exceptional Hardship case, or any other motoring matter, with a dedicated legal team who will fight for you, call us now on 01623 397200.

 

Case Study: Speeding Client Avoids Having Licence Revoked

In Nottingham Magistrates’ Court today, Mickey Brown told Steve Williams, Senior Partner of Forrest Williams, that he was very worried about the prospect of having his licence revoked and therefore returning to learner driver status.

 

When Mickey first approached us, he explained that he had been summoned to a court for a speeding offence of 100mph in a 70mph limit.

 

However, as his case handler soon realised, Mickey’s story was very different to the stereotypical assumptions that could easily be made of a ‘new’ driver who is charged with a serious speeding offence.

 

To begin with, Mickey is not a young ‘boy racer’ but a teaching professional who is approaching 30 years of age. In addition, he has a lot of driving experience both in the UK and abroad.

 

So why the speeding offence, you may ask.  Again, Mickey’s explanation of what happened on the date in question flies in the face of our common-sense understanding of what constitutes a speeding offence. Mickey explained to his case handler, as she prepared his case for court, that he had been making a long journey back home in a heavy storm when a lorry veered into his lane of the dual carriageway.  Mickey told us he had to make a very quick choice – to brake hard and risk skidding on the wet road, or to accelerate and move out of the way of the lorry.  Mickey did the latter.

 

At today’s hearing, Steve Williams advanced mitigation regarding the circumstances of the speeding offence, together with details regarding our client’s usual careful attitude towards driving, extensive driving experience and his clean driving licence.

 

Although the magistrates made very clear to Mickey that every person before them that day with a speeding offence had been disqualified, and gave Mickey a hard time in terms of how his speeding offence had occurred, in the end they were minded to award 5 penalty points – which meant that Mickey avoided the revocation he had been dreading.

 

Mickey told Steve after the hearing that he was very pleased with this outcome, as it meant that he could continue to drive to the various locations at which he delivers education, thereby ensuring there is no future threat to his employment.

 

Once again, the message from Forrest Williams is that representation is vitally important if you have been charged with a serious speeding offence. Mickey was the first (possibly only) defendant today, at Nottingham Magistrates’ Court, to avoid a disqualification for a speeding offence. The facts speak for themselves.

 

If you are being charged with a motoring offence, call our expert team now for honest advice on 01623 397200.

 

 

Forrest Williams TV