Forrest Williams - 24 Hour Motoring Lawyers - page 16 Motoring Advice Blog - Page 16 of 82 - Forrest Williams

Freephone: 0800 1933 999
Mobile Freephone: 01623 397 200

Chat Online

Motoring Advice Blog

Speeding Driver At 70mph in a 40mph Avoids A Ban

Helen Newman of Forrest Williams

Helen Newman of Forrest Williams

 

Speeding Driver At 70mph in a 40mph Avoids A Ban

 

For many people a speeding matter can be their first (and only) contact with the law and the criminal courts process.

 

We recently helped Sarah through such a case.  Sarah was running errands one day and was joining a busy dual carriageway.  She was very aware of the cars around her merging lanes and the approaching roadworks which were causing the cars ahead to group up closer. She was so focused on what was going on around her that she had failed to see the sign altering the speed limit on the slip road.  Sarah was, going with the flow of traffic, travelling at 70mph in a now 40mph limit.  Sarah, and all those around her, were now guilty of an offence and thanks to the recently installed cameras, had been caught breaking the law.

 

When she received the notice of intended prosecution, Sarah signed it, returned it, and expected to receive a fixed penalty notice imposing three points and a £100 fine.  Instead, she received the court summons and was surprised but, upon reading it, saw that she could enter a plea by post, so did so, explaining to the courts what had happened, apologising and waited to hear from them.

 

Sarah did not dispute the offence, she fully accepted she must have been doing the speed if the police said she was.  She was surprised, as she told us she was in a flow of traffic, so if she was caught so were a lot of others, but she does recall seeing the sign when she had travelled the same journey a few days later and believes it was probably there at the time.  She also advised us of a second, smaller sign, further up the slip road.

 

She was very shocked to receive a letter from the courts after her hearing date advising her that they were considering disqualification and that she needed to attend court or be disqualified in her absence.  The penalty for driving at 70mph in a 40mph limit is a 7-56 day disqualification or 6 points. Sarah had not realised the severity of the potential penalty against her and the initial court paperwork held no indication of this.

 

Sarah was accepting of the charge and that she would be punished for this. What she needed to do, for the same of her family and those employed by her development business, was ensure that the penalty imposed by the court was understanding of her situation.

 

Sarah had a clean licence, which had been clean for some time.  She had never been disqualified from driving, and had never been in trouble with the law.  She was a mother of two, a respected business woman, and she was scared.  She was scared because she knew that without her licence she would need to place a hold on her next development project as she would not be able to fulfil the requirements of being the project manager but simultaneously could not afford to hire someone to fulfil that position for the duration of any disqualification.  She works closely with a number of subcontractors to the point that though they are subcontractors she is able to supply enough work to keep them pretty much permanently engaged, so any downtime for her would mean a knock on consequence for those individuals too.  Her daughter would struggle to get to her work experience placement, and her son would struggle to get to school.   To Sarah this was not going to only impact upon her, the ripples to those around her would be devastating.

 

We worked with Sarah to build a case to ensure the court would be aware of this.  We arranged for one of our specialist Barristers from our London chambers to accompany her to Maidstone Magistrates Court and ensure the courts knew what they needed to know when passing sentence.

 

Sarah was thrilled when the courts ordered that her licence be endorsed with 6 points. A terrific result with a high speed offence as the courts will almost always be looking to disqualify and need to be persuaded otherwise.

 

If you have a legal matter and need advice give the Forrest Williams Team a call. If you want your case handled by a firm who pride themselves on customer care, who will listen to you, your needs and your views, understanding that it is your case, then trust the Forrest Williams team and give us call on 01623 397200.

 

Exceptional Hardship for PTSD

Katie Forrest of Forrest Williams

Katie Forrest of Forrest Williams

 

Exceptional Hardship For PTSD

 

I was contacted recently by Tom, an ex-serviceman suffering with severe PTSD. He was at risk of losing his driving licence for 6 months as a result of reaching 12 penalty points.

 

I explained that he would require an Exceptional Hardship application, guided him through the process, and told him how much our fee would be for this service.

 

He told me immediately he couldn’t afford to pay.

 

He was out of work due to his PTSD and had no savings. He thanked me for my help, but said he would have to try to present the case himself.

 

I immediately felt that I had to help this man, and I told him that as a thank you for his service for his country, my firm would prepare his case and represent him in Court free of charge.

 

It is not unusual for law firms to offer pro bono work like this, and it is very rewarding.

 

I had no idea just how rewarding this particular case would be.

 

In order for Tom to avoid the 6 month ban, I had to show that the ban would cause him or someone else Exceptional Hardship.

 

I quickly realised that whilst Tom did transport his elderly father to hospital occasionally, and help out with a charity football team as a minibus driver, these arguments would not be strong enough to convince the Court.

 

If Tom was going to keep his licence, he had to rely on his PTSD, which meant him opening up to me about the atrocities that he had lived through while serving in the Army.

 

Tom agreed to speak to me about this. I warned him that I would have to ask him difficult questions, to put his PTSD into context and show the Court how vital it was for his mental health that he have the freedom to leave the house and not be ‘trapped’.

 

In an incredibly emotional conversation, Tom spoke about his background, his impeccable record of service in the Army, his beloved father and family. Finally, I had to ask about what he had experienced while serving in the Army.

 

Tom broke down immediately, sobbing heavily before passing the phone to his wife. Once he had physically left the room, his wife shared with me Tom’s experience of being captured whilst serving abroad and being kept underground for days with the rest of his group who were captured with him. She told me in graphic detail what Tom had witnessed over the course of the many days that the group were captured, and revealed that only Tom and one other had made it out of there alive.

 

For Tom, feeling trapped anywhere was a huge trigger of being kept in ‘the hole’. Losing his licence for 6 months would isolate him and take away one of the only sources of pleasure in his life; the freedom to set off and go into the open countryside whenever he wanted or needed to.

 

I asked my senior partner, Steve Williams, to represent Tom, something he agreed to immediately.

 

In Court, Steve presented the case on behalf of Tom, who cried throughout. Steve realised that simply telling the magistrates that Tom had had a bad experience in service would not give them the understanding they needed, so he apologised in advance and then shared the full, graphic story with them.

 

The magistrates were visibly upset and immediately granted the Exceptional Hardship application, allowing Tom to continue to drive.

 

Tom sent a lovely eMail after his hearing:

 

THANKYOU Thankyou thankyou Steve was amazing as I told him you are x

 

Tom (although, of course, that’s not your real name!), if you’re reading this – you are the amazing one.

 

Thank you, again, from all of us here at Forrest Williams, for your service.

Exceptional Hardship in Mansfield Magistrates Court

Helen Newman of Forrest Williams

Helen Newman of Forrest Williams

 

Exceptional Hardship in Mansfield Magistrates Court

 

Melinda Swan was delighted this week when magistrates in Mansfield Magistrates’ Court informed her that her Exceptional Hardship application was successful.

 

This result meant that Melinda, an Opening Manager for a popular national restaurant chain, avoided the automatic 6 month disqualification which goes hand in hand with what is known as the ‘totting up’ of points (ie when a person who has held their driving licence for more than 2 years reaches – or exceeds – 12 penalty points).

 

For Melinda, trying to avoid the disqualification was very important as she relies on her driving licence not only to make the 25 mile journey to and from her place of work each day, but also to travel at short notice from her restaurant to others within the chain, ie for reasons of staff sickness, or urgent delivery of food products and consumables.

 

Steve Williams, Senior Partner of Forrest Williams, explained to the court that although Melinda has a partner who works, she could not rely on this person to cover their joint financial commitments for a period of 6 months if she were to lose her job.

 

As Steve told the court, Melinda’s partner had debts and other financial commitments which meant that additional pressure placed on him, at this time, would most probably mean the end of their rocky relationship.

 

In fact, Melinda’s partner had written a letter in which he confirmed to the court that he would not be prepared or able to support Melinda financially during a disqualification period. This letter was handed in for the magistrates to consider, as well as other character reference letters and a letter of apology written by Melinda herself.

 

As the court is a very formal setting, and all statements made should be backed up by evidence, where possible, Steve also handed in a range of other supporting documents which Melinda had carefully prepared in line with the suggestions and advice of her case worker.

 

Forrest Williams offer a bespoke service which includes full preparation of a case, professional representation at the hearing by an experienced motoring law advocate and also a proof-reading service for letters and other documents.

 

Melinda said after the hearing that she had felt fully supported by the company from the moment she made the first phone call to shaking Steve’s hand after they had left court. She would, she said, happily recommend Forrest Williams to anyone who had fallen foul of the ‘totting up’ provisions and received the dreaded summons to court.

 

If you need an application for Exceptional Hardship in Mansfield Magistrates Court call our expert team now on 01623 397200.

 

 

Forrest Williams TV